Benny Gantz Vows IDF Will Continue Operations in Gaza Despite International Court Order
**Israel Vows to Continue Gaza Operations Despite International Court Order**
In a bold defiance of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), War Cabinet Minister Benny Gantz announced on Friday that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will persist with its military operations against Hamas in Gaza, including the search and rescue of Israeli hostages in the Rafah region. This announcement comes in the wake of the ICJ mandating Israel to halt its military activities in Rafah, a directive Israel is set to ignore.
Gantz articulated the nation’s stance, emphasizing Israel’s commitment to a campaign deemed just and necessary following the heinous acts perpetrated by Hamas, including mass killings, abductions, and missile attacks targeting Israeli cities. He underscored the obligation of the state to safeguard its citizens and retrieve hostages, insisting that Israel’s actions in Rafah and beyond would continue to adhere to international law. However, he clarified that such adherence is not due to the pressures from the ICJ but aligns with the values and principles that define Israel.
The decision by the ICJ has sparked outrage among the families of hostages, represented by the Tikva Forum, who are demanding that the Israeli government and War Cabinet dismiss the ICJ’s orders outright. They argue for the continuation of aggressive actions against Hamas to ensure the return of their loved ones.
In response to the ICJ’s ruling, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened a ministerial meeting via telephone to discuss the implications. The meeting saw participation from key figures in the Israeli government, including Foreign Minister Israel Katz, Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, Justice Minister Yariv Levin, and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, among others.
Israel’s firm stance indicates a resolve to continue its military engagement in Gaza, prioritizing the nation’s security and the return of hostages over compliance with the international court’s directive.
